Saw his latest spectacle. The snickering cuts in post, the excess of juxtaposed images of suffering with the gluttonous extremes of the other side. “Sicko” is there for us to see and get a conversation started. Is it quality cinema? N.O.
What is Michael Moore? He is not a documentary filmmaker. That would establish him in company that I think are much more true to the genre than he will ever be. He is not really narrative nor fiction. So were do we categorize the simple man from Flint, Michigan who sticks it to the man again and again? I say he is making a film that is more a debate instigator than exploring a complete wholesome argument. And here’s why…
Unlike the many of sorts we tend to crucify in the media, there are some who hold sacred the practice called objectivity. Down the line you try and see each side and determine where things go from there. It’s certainly difficult to be objective all the time. And I would go further and say that it is not really true to the human condition to be down the center of the goal posts each and every go-around. There are always hooks, and shanks and everything in-between.
In “Sicko”, Moore slams you with human anecdotes who become our characters. He sort of force-feeds you for the first 10-15 minutes and then once you catch your breath you slow down and pull back the reins. But so much energy expunged— who really can get back into it?
But let’s say we can. You go to Europe, to Canada and Cuba to Los Angeles and back all to prove a point… the system is failing. No shit! But I should say that the ride is not without moments of fun. Some probably staged and taked more than once but nonetheless they back up his underlining point – the world has it up on the U.S. when it comes to taking care of their population old and young…
In the end, after we’ve taken our voyage to the far reaches and touched on tender emotions of 9/11, et al. we still come back to Moore sporting his Spartan baseball hat and leading his troops as the mouthpiece for those that cannot speak/breathe for themselves.
I recall an article from Cannes (where the film premiered) where those in attendance stood up in ovation. Why? Do we feel that by cheering for this film we have become a force of resistance? That if we clap in the theatre (as many did in the one I sat in NYC) that we somehow can say we had our moment of sticking it to the man as well?
Here’s what’s what…
I do not dispute the message. It is a good one. We are being bamboozled by a system. Moore highlights the derivation of these and forces us to really lick our wounds because we let this happen. But here is another point. George Bush may be a deplorable leader. But he has funded a behemoth of work to take him on and it is nonstop. We profit off him and he just snickers and jigs it all up between trips to Texas (to keep his contrived drawl intact) and his landing in Washington where everybody is counting the days until he cedes the title to somebody who thinks hubris is not a euphemism for cowardice.
Moore is guilty of profiting off the slights and drastic slips by the many who are in the pole positions of power.
His message is not that springs forth a movement. Far from it. Outcry must seed from within and must come with an agenda that knows the origins and know the goals – albeit far-reaching but worthy of fighting nonetheless. We saw glimpses of it. We saw it in the streets before we invaded another poor country with rich resources far, far away. And now we have let ourselves become a muzzled generation because fear of safety, of wealth, of security — all ostensibly at-risk. Who wants to hinder Harvard schemes and caviar dreams?
We hesitate to question and can only vicariously put our fists up as the lights slowly brighten and our 90 minutes is up. I guess we can thank our man for this for canning a bunch of this this stuff and sharing it on a screen for the many to partake. But I would have done fine spending a day rocking out with the world to some faux-movement at LIVE Earth and felt that I was doing my job. It’s hip to be green. But everybody is pigy-backing off this to generate more profiting and getting into the new square with not-so-determined edges and ends.
Perhaps Moore’s next undertaking will be the environment. He will go to the Brazilian Rainforest to discuss how the nuts must be preserved to keep his favorite ice cream flavor in the frozen aisles and then it’s off to Antarctica where he will hijack a penguin from a zoo and let it be free. Cameras will roll, of course. What wul dbe the point otherwise! Then… Cue the lights. Add the standing ovation! Another statement. But a cinematic leap forward? Baby steps. Baby steps.